CONTACTS

Reserve a visit

+39 05529375

Mail

SAM FALLS

Sam Falls (1984) lives and works Los Angeles.
Solo show: CAPRI, Dusseldorf (2019), Hammer Museum, Los Angeles (2018), Museo d’Arte Moderna e Contemporaneo di Trento e Rovereto, Trento (2018), September Spring, The Kitchen, New York, Stati Uniti (2015); Ballroom Marfa, Marfa, Texas, Stati Uniti (2015); Fondazione Giuliani, Roma, Italia (2015); Zabludowicz Collection, Londra, Regno Unito (2014); Sam Falls: Light over Time, Public Art Fund, Brooklyn, New York, Stati Uniti (2014); Pomona College Museum of Art, Pomona, California, Stati Uniti (2014); LA><ART, Los Angeles, Stati Uniti (2013).
International show: Kunsthalle Helsinki, Helsinki, Finlandia (2016); Wasteland, Mona Bismarck American Center, Parigi, Francia (2016); Another Minimalism: Art after California Light and Space, Mead Gallery, University of Warwick (2016) e Fruitmarket Gallery, Edinburgo, Regno Unito (2015); Splitting Light, UB Art Gallery, University at Buffalo, New York, Stati Uniti (2015); Apparition: Frottage and Rubbings from 1985 to Now, Hammer Museum, in collaborazione con The Menil Collection, Houston, Los Angeles, Stati Uniti (2015); Per_formare una collezione#1, Museo MADRE, Napoli, Italia (2014); A different kind of Order: The ICP Triennial, International Center of Photography, New York, Stati Uniti (2013).

His work is part of important collection: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles; Museum of Contemporary Art Los Angeles, Los Angeles; The Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston; The Allbright Knox, Buffalo, New York; Zabludowicz Collection, Londra.

 

Untitled (Antinori) | Interview with Sam Falls

 

The seduction experienced by Californian-born artist Sam Falls (San Diego, 1983), from the paysage of cantine Antinori del Chianti Classico, isn’t curiously related to the solar element. Indeed, as the curator Ilaria Bonacossa tells us about the site-specific work “Untitled (Antinori)” part of the Antinori Art Project, Falls seems deeply involved with the nocturnal tenderness throught which he realizes his monumental plant-related frottage. In the words of Bonacossa, “Sam Falls stretches out the canvases through the vineyards and collects the (apparently) fortuitous traces of leaves, flowers and animals”.
His work appears a sort of photogenic drawing, a shadow, a trace or a spoor that make visible the indiscernible passage of an elusive entity.
Far from masculine energy of American Land Art Movement – that Falls ironically describes as “macho” – his approach to nature is feminine, ludic, ambiguous and transparent.
The way in which Falls explores the vineyards is intimately careful. Its canvases collects minimum signs and keeps records of their essence.
In this way, “flowers and vine leaves are exposed for 5 nights – and also during a storm – protecting canvases from pigments. They become a sort of burial shroud of nature”.

 

Elena Bordignon has made any questions to the artist.

 

Elena Bordignon: Your work for Antinori Art Project is intensely related to the exhibition space of cantina Antinori nel Chianti Classico. Can you tell me how the project came about? What are the main perspectives that you have considered?  

 

Sam Falls: I believe Alessia Antinori saw my work at the Hammer Museum and Ilaria Bonacossa had seen my work at Franco Noero gallery and so we met in Torino and I was invited to think about a project. I came to Tuscany and the Cantina for a site visit and it appealed to me because of the attention to nature from the area and knowing it was a very open project that I could work immersing myself in the vineyards and plants surrounding me. After the visit I decided it could be conducive to make a large piece and the winery had the space to do something like five meters long, so I started.

 

EB: The temporal influence appears fundamental in the construction of the work. For many reasons, “Untitled (Antinori)” has been realized by nature itself: the rain, the sun, the wind… Of course, you can not control these elements and their effects on the work. What is the rule of chaos in your creative process?

 

SF: My relationship to chaos in some way comes from my experience as a child growing up in Vermont and Los Angeles between a place that is very green (Vermont) and has rain in the summer and snow in winter versus Los Angeles which is a desert. I spent a lot of time as a kid, as an only child, in the woods by myself or in the desert alone and I always felt very familiar with nature. When I was doing my work with the sun, I always remembered finding clothes and things that had been lost in the woods or on rocks that were bleached by sunlight and that is how I began working with the sun, Later when I was studying photography.
And on the other hand working with the rain there is a prediction of course with meteorologists who know what will be happening with nature and then there are the pigments. I have worked enough with the pigments that I know something will happen on the canvas. If it rains a lot the pigments get kind of washed out and you get a deeper color, but if it rains just a little bit or it doesn’t rain at all and you just have moisture in the night air, like dew, then there is a sharper image. So between the two myself and nature’s hand we make the image. My relationship to nature is really based on experience and my relationship to art is also based on experience so together there is a synchronicity. I try to limit the amount of chaos to more of a predictive sense with the moisture especially, so I know when it rains too much that the image will not get washed out.

 

EB: The work of art can be considered as ”a poetic portrait of nature”, but it could also remember Land Art’s and Environmentalist’s interventions. How do you imagine your research related to this movement?

 

SF: Well I think about it a lot and my relation to Land Art is kind of articulate; that I admire it but I also think it was of a time before environmental concerns were really part of our contemporary existence. I think now we have to be much more considerate of nature… so if Land Art was like building a new town or city, my relationship to nature and art is more like going camping: when I go out to work I am in nature, I am inspired by nature, I work with it but I bring everything else back and I leave nature as it was. The rest of art is more like renting an apartment in a city, like painting in a studio, if you see what I mean. I also always felt Land Art was very masculine, very assertive, very macho and you can feel this in the works themselves and so I wanted to be more sensitive to nature, I wanted to be more holistic, not feminine necessarily, but just more natural.

 

Stefano Arienti

Stefano Arienti was born in Asola in the province of Mantua in 1961. After earning a degree in agricultural studies, he turned to art under the guidance of Corrado Levi and made his debut in Milan in the mid Eighties at the Brown Boveri (an ex factory that many young artists used as a meeting place for free experimentation).  Arienti currently lives and works in Milan.

He has participated in numerous shows: the Venice Biennale (Aperto 1990, 1993); the Istanbul Biennial (1992); Cocido y Crudo, Museo Reina Sofia, Madrid (1994); XII Rome Quadrennial, 1996 (first prize winner); Fatto in Italia, Centre d’Art Contemporain, Geneva; ICA, London (1997); and Gwangju Biennale (2008).

Arienti’s most recent solo exhibitions: MAXXI, Rome (2004); Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Turin (2005); Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston (2007); Fondazione Querini Stampalia, Venice (2008); MAMbo (with Cesare Pietroiusti, 2008); Palazzo Ducale, Mantua (2009); and Museion, Bolzano (with Massimo Bartolini, 2011).

 

INTERVIEW WITH STEFANO ARIENTI

 

The masterpiece by Giovanni Della Robbia reinterpreted by Stefano Arienti.

The Antinori family, under the patronage of Antinori Art Project, have commissioned Stefano Arienti, (born in Asola, Italy, 1961), to develop a new project in dialogue with a historical Renaissance masterpiece:  the lunette depicting the Resurrection of Christ, a sculptural relief by Giovanni Della Robbia (Florence, 1469-1529/30) commissioned by Niccolò di Tommaso Antinori  in the early 16th century.
This lunette, referred to as the “Antinori lunette” by art historians, belongs to the Brooklyn Museum in New York and, after an absence of 500 years, will be publicly shown at the Bargello National Museum in Florence from November 9th2017 to April 8th 2018.  The relief has recently been restored in the United States with generous support from the Antinori family.
Stefano Arienti’s project is two fold; two separate yet complementary works of art, achieving a unique transformation and reinterpretation of the famous lunette.
Arienti’s piece titled “Scena Fissa” and the Antinori lunette will be exhibited in two adjoining galleries creating a direct dialogue between Renaissance and contemporary art in the exhibition “From Brooklyn to the Bargello:  Giovanni Della Robbia, the Antinori Lunette and Stefano Arienti”.
At the same time, the state-of-the-art winery Antinori nel Chianti Classico will inaugurate a new site-specific installation by Arienti, “Altorilievo”, that will become part of the family’s permanent collection, accentuating their strong interest in history and renewing their legacy as patrons of the arts.  The exhibition is curated by Ilaria Bonacossa.

 

Interview by Elena Bordignon / ATPdiry.com

 

Could you tell me how you developed your initial ideas regarding the important lunette depicting The Resurrection of Christ, made in the early 16th century by Giovanni Della Robbia?

Stefano Arienti: My first contact with this work by Giovanni Della Robbia took the form of photographs, which were not all that good. It was evidently a very colourful work, very pictorial, crowded with figures, to the point that it could easily hold its own in a comparison with many contemporary or pop images, which are often overloaded with figures and colour.
But I was also lucky enough to be able to see it face to face at the Brooklyn Museum, where they kindly allowed me to observe it from close up. It is a work consisting of numerous parts that fit together, and so I thought that it would be interesting to disassemble it in order to reconstruct different combinations of the pieces. In addition, in order to move away from the Renaissance technique with all its seductive colour, I tried reducing everything to a monochrome drawing, to understand what could have been the artist’s initial ideas regarding the study of the figures.

On this occasion you are presenting two projects – “Scena Fissa” for Museo Nazionale del Bargello and “Altorilievo” for the Antinori Winery in the Chianti Classico district – separate but closely related. Could you tell me about the connections between the two projects?

SA: Both works are divergent developments of the same material: the modelled parts comprising the lunette, a very busy resurrection scene in which just the donor Antinori and a sleeping soldier are apparently motionless.
“Scena Fissa” transports the figures that are crowded into the lunette into a more spacious setting, a sort of garden-theatre where observers can move around as they like, even looking behind the figures, and to an extent it maintains the overall arrangement of the figures. While “Altorilievo” actually uses exactly the same drawings, in actual fact they are transformed into detached three-dimensional pieces, for which we can imagine a relation between the different parts. This second work is wall-mounted rather than constituting a setting, and the idea is that it recalls more a group of archaeological fragments than the description of a scene.

What do you mean when you say that you have to enter images in order to “bring them to life in a new way, making them different from the past but also with respect to ourselves”?

SA: I like it when works of art achieve their own independence, the result of a healthy relationship with the public, more than of the artist’s intentions. As a contemporary artist, I take pleasure in demonstrating a possible way of relating to works from the past, providing an example of how to look at them in a new way, or giving them a parallel existence in the present, reconstituting them outside their museum display case.

To develop the works, you began from a study of the results of the Lunette’s restoration. What attracted you in this operation?

SA: When you see the lunette face to face, you are overwhelmed by the colour, the material and the movement, the great pictorial density of the entire unit; and only then do you become aware of the individual parts, that may have very different proportions, with no relation to a perspective view of the group. You understand that forms have been used in an expressionist way, an anticipation of the highly theatrical compositions that you can see in the “Sacri monti” (Sacred Mountains). During the restoration, the plaster-based mortar binding the parts together was removed, and at the end of the restoration the components were not plastered together again. The thing that struck me most powerfully was this large three-dimensional puzzle.

Could you tell me how you developed the work “Altorilievo”?

SA: I was particularly impressed by my visit to the Bargino winery, and, thinking of a possible site for “Altorilievo”, I immediately liked the “vinsantaia”, the room for making Vin Santo. I identified a wall with an unusual profile, created by a negative vault that lowers towards the centre of the hall. It has exactly the opposite shape with respect to the lunette, and it provided a justification for spreading the fragments over a larger surface. The space is rather dark and meditative, ideal for ageing vin santo, and it is perfect for a work that ends up by being more enigmatic than just a simple religious scene. The fragments are separated and the observer has to invent a landscape in which to place them.

The work “Altorilievo” is installed in the futuristic spaces of the Cantina Antinori winery in the Chianti Classico district. What was your reaction to this location with its distinctive structures? Was it difficult to relate to this setting?

SA: Even though I started from a source far removed in time, with a well-defined iconography, my work is a project that belongs to the present, and I am perfectly at home in a contemporary architectural situation. In fact I think that this actually enhances the characteristics of my work. I like futuristic lines together with traditional colours and materials, sobriety and eccentricity elegantly combined.

Nicolas Party

Nicolas Party was born in Switzerland in 1980. He lives and works in Brussels. After studying at the Lausanne School of Art in Lausanne, he took a Master at the Glasgow School of Art. His works have been presented in many European and American institutions, and he has had solo shows at: Centre d’art Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland; Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas; Inverleith House, Edinburgh; Kunsthall Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway; Westfälischer Kunstverein, Münster; Swiss Institute, New York; La Placette, Lausanne. His works have been exhibited in many group shows, including Bonner Kunstverein, Bonn; Kunstzentrum Glasgow; Museum Folkwang, Essen; Eastside Projects, Birmingham; Le Quartier Centre d’Art Contemporain, Quimper.

Jorge Peris

Jorge Peris was born in Alzira, Valencia in 1969. He lives and works in El Palmar near Valencia. His solo exhibitions include: Tamaris, Musée du chateau des ducs de Wurtemberg, Montbeliard (2012) curated by Aurelie Voltz, Aladas Almas, La Conservera Centro de Arte Contemporanea, Ceutí, Murcia (2011), Micro, Aureo, Adela, MACRO, Roma (2010) curated by Francesco Stocchi. Mr. Peris has also exhibited his works at CA2M, Madrid (2011); Fondazione Giuliani per l’Arte Contemporanea, Rome (2010); Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Turin (2008) and at MARCO, Museo de Arte Contemporanea de Vigo, Spain (2007).

Yona Friedman

Yona Friedman (nato a Budapest nel 1923, vive a Parigi), se il suo modo di pensare e il suo linguaggio plastico sono ancora oggi all’avanguardia – come testimoniano i numerosi e continui inviti a mostre e biennali internazionali – è soprattutto perché il suo pensiero e il suo modo di trasmetterlo, attraverso manuali di disegni illustrati, bozzetti di studio, prove, conferenze e lezioni, riflettono e reinventano i principi fondamentali universalmente condivisi.

Il punto focale della ricerca di Yona Friedman è l’individuo in qualità di creatura unica e indispensabile all’equilibrio dell’universo, con tutte le sue capacità, ispirazioni e potenzialità.

Un pensiero fortemente indirizzato al prossimo, con uno sguardo puntato sullo stato del mondo e sugli spazi adattati per realizzare un sistema democratico condiviso.

Le opere di Yona Friedman sono state esposte nelle mostre internazionali più prestigiose: Biennale di Lione, Triennale di Yokohama, Biennale di Venezia, Drawing Center, Capc di Bordeaux, Fondazione Ratti a Como, Cneai, Ile de Vassivière e Documenta a Kassel.

Yona Friedman è un artista straordinario che supera i confini tra diverse discipline. Ha scritto e fornito le illustrazioni per più di cinquanta libri, molti dei quali tradotti in italiano, che riguardano le sue ricerche in numerosi ambiti: architettura, ecologia e linguaggio.

Rosa barba

Rosa Barba (nata ad Agrigento nel 1972, vive a Berlino), ha studiato presso l’Academy of Media Arts di Colonia e ha frequentato la residenza del Rijksakademie di Amsterdam.

Il lavoro di Rosa Barba implica “un sottile interrogativo e la predilezione per il cinema industriale come soggetto di ciò che potrebbe essere percepito come messinscena – il luogo, il non attore, il gesto, il genere, l’informazione, l’abilità e l’autorità, il banale – asportazioni tratte dal realismo sociale, dentro le quali sono osservate e che le qualificano come componenti del lavoro, da incorniciare, ridisegnare, rappresentare. Gli effetti di queste lotte e rifusioni tra verità e finzione, mito e realtà, metafora e valore intrinseco portano a un grado di disorientamento che si estende nella pratica concettuale e che rimaneggia la messa in scena di chi guarda come un atto di rovesciamento radicale ed esilarante.

Rosa Barba ha tenuto mostre personali al Contemporary Art Museum di St. Louis, al Jeu de Paume a Parigi, al Kunsthaus di Zurigo, al Marfa Book Co, alla Fondazione Galleria Civica di Trento, al MART di Rovereto, al Kunstverein di Braunschweig, alla Tate Modern, al Centre international d’art et du paysage de l’île de Vassivière, al Center of Contemporary Arts di Tel Aviv e al Baltic Art Center. Ha inoltre partecipato a numerose mostre collettive al Maxxi di Roma, al Museo Reina Sofia a Madrid e biennali tra le quali la 53 Biennale di Venezia, quella di Tessalonico e Liverpool.

Diego Perrone

Born in Asti in Italy’s Piedmont region, Diego Perrone currently lives and works in Milan. He works in various mediums, including sculpture, photography, and installation. His most recent personal shows are: in 2013, il Servo Astuto (“the Clever Servant”) at the Bolzano Museon, curator Frida Carazzato; Scultura che non sia conchiglia non canta (“A Scupture which is not a Shell Does not Sing”) at the Casey Kaplan Gallery in New York; in 2010, Diego Perrone, curator Giovanni Iovane, at the Fondazione Brodbeck; in 2009, Il Merda –Prima Parte (“Shit – First part”), at Massimo De Carlo, Milan, Italy; in 2008, We are in the black world of Mamuttones, Galerie Giti Nourbakhsch, Berlin and “Wolves and Casting of Bells”, Casey Kaplan, New York; in 2007, “Boccioni’s mother in an ambulance and the casting of the bell”, curator Charlotte Laubard, Musée d’Art Contemporain in Bordeaux, co-presented at the MAMBO in Bologna, curator Andrea Villani; Diego Perrone has participated in numerous collective shows, among which can be numbered: the  Venice Biennale – Il Palazzo Enciclopedico (“the Encyclopedic Palace”) curator Massimiliano Gioni, the Venice Biennale, Giardini – Arsenale, Venezia; 2010 “21 x 21: artists for the 21° Century”, Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Torino; 2009/2008, “Italics: Art between Tradition and Revolution, 1968-2008”, curator Francesco Bonami, Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago co-presented at the Palazzo Grassi, Venezia; “After Nature” curator Massimiliano Gioni, New Museum, New York; 2006, “Of Mice and Men: 4th Berlin Biennale for Contemporary Art”, curator Maurizio Cattelan, Massimiliano Gioni, and Ali Subotnick, Berlin; 2005, “11th Triennale India”, Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi; “Dialectics of Hope”, Moscow Biennale of Contemporary Art Moscow, Russia; 2003, “The Zone”, curator  Massimiliano Gioni; 50th Esposizione Internazionale d’Arte La Biennale di Venezia; “KunstFilmBiennale Cologne 2003”, curator Hans-Peter Schwerfel and Detlef Langer, Cologne.

Patrick Tuttofuoco

Patrick Tuttofuoco, è nato a Milano nel 1974 e attualmente vive e lavora a Berlino. A partire dal 2000, data della sua prima mostra personale presso la Galleria Studio Guenzani di Milano, il suo lavoro è stato oggetto di un interesse costantemente crescente da parte di critici, curatori e collezionisti internazionali.

L’artista ha partecipato a diverse esposizioni collettive a livello internazionale tra cui la Quadriennale di Arte Contemporanea allo Stedelijk Museum voor Aktuelle Kunst di Gent nel 2001, la 50a Biennale di Venezia nel 2003, la Biennale di Shanghai nel 2006 e la 10a Bienal de la Habana a Cuba, 2008.  Ha tenuto mostre personali tra l’altro presso la Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo di Torino nel 2006, la Künstlerhaus Bethanien di Berlino nel 2008 e presso lo Studio Guenzani, a Milano dopo la prima, nel 2002, 2005 e 2009 ed è prevista, sempre nella galleria milanese, un’altra personale nel 2014.

La Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo ha dedicato a Patrick Tuttofuoco una monografia in occasione della mostra dell’artista nel 2006.

Le sue opere sono state pubblicate su alcune tra le più importanti riviste d’arte contemporanea internazionali oltre che in numerosi cataloghi.

Nel 2011 Patrick Tuttofuoco è stato presentato insieme a John Kleckner alla galleria Peres Project di Berlino. Nel 2013 invece l’Istituto Italiano di Cultura a Madrid, in collaborazione con la

Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo ha curato la mostra personale dell’artista Focus on his Eyes per la quale è stato realizzato un catalogo da NERO edizioni.

Giorgio Andreotta Calò

Giorgio Andreotta Calò è nato nel 1979 a Venezia, Italia. Vive e lavora ad Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi. Le sue mostre personali comprendono: La sculpture langue morte, Institut Culturel Italien de Paris, Parigi, Wilfried Lentz, Rotterdam (2014); level, Peep-Hole @ Fonderia Battaglia, Milano (2014); 08.09.2012 – 21.10.2012, SMART Project Space, Amsterdam (2012); 22 luglio 1911 / 22 luglio 2011, Premio Lum per l’arte contemporanea, Teatro Margherita, Bari (2011). Tra le collettive si segnalano: Ritratto dell’artista da giovane, Castello di Rivoli, Rivoli (2014); The Volkskrant Art Prize 2014, Stedelijk Museum Schiedam, Schiedam (2014); Premio Italia Arte Contemporanea 2012, MAXXI, Roma (2012); ILLUMInazioni / ILLUMInations, 54. Biennale di Venezia, Venezia (2011); SI – Sindrome Italiana, la jeune création artistique italienne, Magasin – Centre National d’Art contemporain de Grenoble, Grenoble (2010).

Tomás Saraceno

Dopo aver studiato arte e architettura Tomás Saraceno (1973) ha sviluppato negli ultimi quindici anni un corpus di lavori che lo ha portato a partecipare alla Biennale Internazionale di Arti Visive di Venezia nel 2001, 2003 e 2009, alla Biennale di São Paulo nel 2006. Le sue opere sono state esposte in musei internazionali come Barbican Art Center a Londra nel 2006, Bonniers Konsthall di Stoccolma nel 2010, Hamburger Bahnhof a Berlino nel 2011, il Metropolitan Museum di New York, HangarBicocca a Milano nel 2012 e nel 2013 K21 a Düsseldorf. Nel 2009 Saraceno è stato artista-residente del International Space Studies Program della NASA, e successivamente nel 2012 ha sviluppato un progetto con il MIT Center for Art, Science Technology (CAST) di Boston; nel 2009 Saraceno ha vinto il Calder Prize per le Arti.

Jean-Baptiste Decavèle

Jean-Baptiste Decavèle (nato nel 1961 a Grenoble, vive a Parigi), nel 1999, riceve il premio Villa Médicis Hors les Murs per il progetto Entre Ciel et Mer Voyage Aide Mémoires e ancora nel 2001 per Nostalgie, la Demeurance et l’Icone, scritto con Tatamkulu Afrika.

Il suo lavoro molto spesso è, infatti, legato a importanti collaborazioni (Hervé Le Tellier, Elina Loewensohn, Michael Lonsdale, Nico Dockx). Da molti anni, Jean-Baptiste Decavèle, collabora con l’architetto Yona Friedman. Il lavoro del duo Friedman-Decavèle è costituito da una costellazione di invenzioni architettoniche, creazioni fotografiche e video, che si innestano in un universo utopico e visionario. Oltre che per i progetti, i due artisti sono legati da una profonda amicizia e un’avventura creativa che prende forma nella fittizia isola di Balkis Island.

Oggi il lavoro dell’artista francese si suddivide tra opere cinematografiche e opere multiple, che considera come processi sperimentali. All’interno di questi video, ogni persona che è parte del processo creativo, dal tecnico al curatore fino all’artista, sono potenziali figure narrative con le proprie funzioni e finzioni. Jean-Baptiste Decavèle ha recentemente esposto a Parigi, Toronto, Vancouver, Roma, New York, Cape Town. Ha, inoltre, preso parte a festival video sia in Italia che in Francia.